Return to LanScape's home page Go back a page...       Active TopicsActive Topics   Display List of Forum MembersMember List   Knowledge Base SearchSearch   HelpHelp  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

LanScape VOIP Media Engine™ - Pre-Sales Technical Support
 LanScape Support Forum -> LanScape VOIP Media Engine™ - Pre-Sales Technical Support
Subject Topic: “non-branded version” of the media engine Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
speedvoip
Vetran
Vetran


Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 156
Posted: October 21 2008 at 7:54pm | IP Logged Quote speedvoip

Hi Support:
I think "X-VOIP-SDK:" header also can be modified by ModifySipMessage API procedure upon event callback, isn't it?

Can your company license “non-branded version” of the media engine? How about its price? Is it same as normal one in terms of licensing charge?

I prefer there is API for changing session name in SDP portion of SIP message.
Back to Top View speedvoip's Profile Search for other posts by speedvoip Visit speedvoip's Homepage
 
support
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: January 26 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 1666
Posted: October 22 2008 at 6:42am | IP Logged Quote support

Hi speedvoip,

You >>>
I think "X-VOIP-SDK:" header also can be modified by ModifySipMessage API procedure upon event callback, isn't it?

<<< Support
The “X-VOIP-SDK” cannot be removed by using the ModifySipMessage() API procedure.

You >>>
Can your company license “non-branded version” of the media engine?

<<< Support
Yes.

You >>>
How about its price? Is it same as normal one in terms of licensing charge?

<<< Support
Not sure what the exact licensing price will be for your deployment scenario but it would be more than the standard product price. Our two groups will have to discuss. We get a ton of product exposure by having a LanScape SIP header in the protocol packets that get transmitted. Unless we receive fair compensation that justifies the removal of our “SDK stamp” in transmitted SIP messages, we cannot remove it. Its simply a matter of economics.


You >>>
I prefer there is API for changing session name in SDP portion of SIP message.

<<< Support
Yes… agreed… this would be the preferred method.



Support

Back to Top View support's Profile Search for other posts by support Visit support's Homepage
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Contact LanScape Hear what the Lawyers have to say How youm may use this site Read your privacy rights